Title: The Best American Science Fiction and Fantasy 2018
Editor: N. K. Jemisin
Series Editor: John Joseph Adams
Publisher: Mariner Books
Readers of this column may not be surprised to find me once again covering this year's installment
of what I consider the par excellence genre reprint anthology series. As with previous entries (see
here for my review of the 2016 volume; here for my take on 2017's), to assemble this set of tales
John Joseph Adams read over a thousand stories and selected his top eighty; then, stripping the
stories of their bylines, he passed them on to our volume-specific editor--in this case none other
than record-triple-crown-Hugo-winning luminary N. K. Jemisin--who in turn chose her favorite
twenty. Thus, this fourth book in the series preserves an overall sense of aesthetic continuity with
those that came before, while also being emblazoned with Jemisin's bold editorial stamp. The
result is an excellent array of work that wonderfully celebrates diverse voices and styles, ranging
far and wide in ideas and approaches but consistently delivering on quality.
There are six stories that I found exceptional, but because I've already reviewed one of them in
this space--Peter Watts's mind-bending "ZeroS," originally published in Jonathan Strahan's
Infinity Wars--I'm going to limit my discussion here to the remaining five. Kate Alice Marshall's
"Destroy the City with Me Tonight" may be the most innovative "superhero" story I've ever
encountered; in fact, I only viewed it through that lens the second time around. My first sense of it
was as an exquisitely moody meditation on illness, memory, and identity, dramatized through a
fictional disease, Caspar-Williams Syndrome, which bridges the distance between the external
world and the interiority of our flesh: "The city is mapped on her bones, to lines that wrap ribs,
tibia, mandible. A dense knot of streets engraves her sternum; a lonely road carves a notch in her
clavicle." Marshall's writing is as tight as the physicality she describes, and is in perfect equipoise
with the story's pervasive nostalgia and psychological disintegration. A reference to a variation of
the disease being a possible "pathology," along with some other touches, add a Ballardian
In a more overtly fantastical vein, Maria Dahvana Headley's "The Orange Tree" supremely
colorizes and modernizes, as a Historical Note explains, the legend "of the wooden golem created
by the Andalusian Hebrew poet Solomon ibn Gabirol (1021-ca. 1058);" at the story's outset,
Solomon arrives in Málaga, his place of birth, "in a last attempt to heal himself. He's saltfish.
Something's climbed beneath his skin, creating scabrous ridges on the sides of his ears and lips,
and a cough, sometimes bloody." His true foe is loneliness, which Headley catalogs in ingenious
ways, and the consequences of his creation of a female golem are likewise rendered in vividly
gruesome and memorable detail. It has taken the gifts of a modern-day poet and literary conjuress
like Headley to rightfully animate this ancient story.
Samuel R. Delany's "The Hermit of Houston" is a long, deliberately paced, utterly absorbing
marriage of logical near-future extrapolation with splashes of bizarre liminality and chilling
moments of understated transgression. It opens with the following words: "'First off,' I remember
the Hermit's assistant told us, 'you can't tell the entire story.'" And yet Delany manages to give
us a whole narrative, demonstrating his attention to language in the ways we've come to expect,
and making every page compelling despite the lack of a clear plot and some purposely inscrutable
Maureen F. McHugh's "Cannibal Acts" is as grim, if not grimmer, as her title suggests, but it is
also incredibly precise: "There's a difference between dissection and butchering. Dissection
reveals, but butchering renders." McHugh, equally skilled at ideas and sensory immersion, forces
us to ponder whether we, if in her big-virus-ravaged world, would count ourselves among the
abstainers or the eaters. The concluding lines highlight the possible pointlessness of such
And finally, for a change of pace, I want to single out Rachael K. Jones's "The Greatest One-Star
Restaurant in the Whole Quadrant," perhaps the only comic piece in this selection, and very
welcome for it. Jones creates a delectably absurdist scenario wherein cyborgs who have stolen a
ship must cater to humans drawn to its food shuttle beacon; said cyborgs, using their own flesh in
the preparation of meals, get hooked on the notion of earning higher star ratings for their service.
Jones's comedic chops are impeccable, but there's more than clever juxtapositions and snappy
word choices here, as the story concludes on a memorably poignant note.
Other heavy hitters are A. Merc Rustad's "Brightened Star, Ascending Dawn," a graceful space
opera about a sentient ship--Anne McCaffrey's The Ship Who Sang comes to mind--that takes
on a young girl stowaway, with momentous consequences; Kathleen Kayembe's Congolese
horror-extravaganza "You Will Always Have Family: A Triptych," an eerie take on paternal
betrayal as told through three distinct first-person voices; Charlie Jane Anders's "Don't Press
Charges and I Won't Sue,, which urgently warns against future attempts at transgender, and more
broadly identity, erasure; Carmen Maria Machado's "The Resident," a richly atmospheric
character journey that doubles as artful subversion of the madwoman-in-the-attic trope;
Gwendolyn Clare's "Tasting Notes on the Varietals of the Southern Coast" establishes a heart-rending equation linking cultural hedonism with genocide, and concludes with a particularly
striking, wine-besotted image; and finally Micah Dean Hicks's "Church of Birds," whose
protagonist swan boy frames a nuanced contemplation on being an outcast and having one's
desires profoundly, and tragically, misunderstood.
The remaining work, by Lettie Prell, Caroline M. Yoachim, Cadwell Turnbull, Jaymee Goh, E.
Lily Yu, Maria Dahvana Headley (a second story), Tobias S. Buckell and Charles Payseur is of
high caliber, often clever, and thoroughly moving and bittersweet in its allegorical value and its
literalization of present-day issues. Several of these stories were up for major awards and you may
prefer them over my own personal picks.
My only quibble, if I have one, with this anthology on the whole is that I'm not sure I'd rate the
opening and closing pieces, enjoyable as they are, as surefire sells for prospective readers. But
perhaps an argument can be made for their greater accessibility. Regardless, there is no doubt that
if you want to get a sense of how far contemporary science fiction and fantasy can stretch, reading
the annual The Best American Science Fiction and Fantasy has become de rigueur.
Title: Astounding: John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, L. Ron Hubbard, and the Golden Age of Science Fiction
Author: Alec Nevala-Lee
Publisher: Dey Street Books
It doesn't take the kind of prophesying that many readers of Golden Age science fiction came to
see as synonymous with that period's most venerated magazine, Astounding Science Fiction, to
predict that Alec Nevala-Lee's four-way biography of John W. Campbell, the magazine's most
prestigious editor, and Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, and L. Ron Hubbard will for the
foreseeable future represent the standard reference on this time and subject. Nevala-Lee spent
several years poring through the primary literature--including voluminous
correspondence--tracking down special collections and source documentation related to
Astounding's heyday and the lives of his four subjects, and interviewing those with first-hand
testimony about Campbell. The result is an engrossing, sweeping, and far-reaching chronicle of
one of the most fascinating chapters of American science fiction and the technologically fecund
period of American history in which it was nestled. The book's opening section begins in 1907, its
fifth and concluding part running through 1971, but the heart of the text revolves around "the
golden age of science fiction, which ran roughly from 1939 to 1950."
Given the significance of the Golden Age, it would be naïve to think it hasn't been covered
before, indeed by some of its very shapers and movers. Asimov's lengthy two-volume
autobiography, In Memory Yet Green and In Joy Still Felt, along with the latter recapitulating I.
Asimov, remain relevant, as do Frederik Pohl's The Way the Future Was, Donald Wollheim's The
Universe Makers, Damon Knight's The Futurians, Jack Williamson's Wonder Child, and van
Vogt's Reflections of A. E. van Vogt; additionally, William H. Patterson's more recent two-volume Robert A. Heinlein, and Lawrence Wright's Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and
the Prison of Belief remain must-reads for anyone interested in the period and in the trajectory of
Asimov's, Heinlein's and Hubbard's lives. But what if you've already read all of the above?
Beyond what turns out to be an elegant synthesis of these various overlapping narratives, does
Nevala-Lee offer anything fresh?
Yes, in two important ways. First, there's no single book-length overview of Campbell's life and
work, and Astounding/Campbell are Nevala-Lee's consistent focal points. This proves invaluable.
By better understanding Campbell as a human being--his upbringing, his early non-literary
ambitions, his writing, and, perhaps most relevantly, first his parental and later his marital
relationships--we receive new insights into the bonds he forged with Asimov, Heinlein and
Hubbard, and why he acted the way he did. Campbell's involvement in helping to develop the
Three Laws of Robotics, for example, is well-documented, as was his general penchant for
suggesting ideas and plots to his writers. I was surprised, though, at how Jack Williamson, under
Campbell's direction, in his stories "Backlash" and "Breakdown," anticipated two key concepts of
Asimov's other popular series, the Foundation stories: namely the idea of a Foundation itself, and
a precursor of psychohistory.
Asimov, Heinlein and Hubbard started their careers by having to go through Campbell, not the
other way around, and this had long-term consequences on how and what they wrote. Even when
they departed from Campbell's sensibility, they made specific choices to do so. "Science fiction
became an ongoing collaboration between writers and fans, and the most convincing proof of
Campbell's success," Nevala-Lee astutely observes, "is the fact that he lost control of it."
A second achievement here is our unprecedented understanding of these writers' personal
interdynamics. The aforementioned bios are all steeped in individual subjectivities, while this book
doesn't foreground one subjectivity over another--with one possible exception in the credibility
department, relating to L. Ron Hubbard. Nevala-Lee makes clear that Asimov and Heinlein, in
their individual ways, were prone to self-aggrandizement, but Hubbard's proclivity for self-mythologizing is of a different order of magnitude. Regarding an early incident, we're told, for
example (italics mine): "The only source for this story is Hubbard himself, which is reason enough
to be skeptical of it." Besides this distrust of Hubbard's claims, Nevala-Lee is also unafraid of
making moral assessments about his subjects, and likewise enthusiastically proffers his personal
evaluations of much of the work discussed. Eric Frank Russell's Sinister Barrier, for example,
according to Nevala-Lee, "still deserves to be ranked as one of the greatest science fiction novels
ever written." These types of pronouncements are likely to provoke hearty engagement with the
book, which is certainly better than the alternative. Despite their deep flaws and often problematic
attitudes and behaviors--Asimov's constant harassment of women in particular is difficult to
stomach--Nevala-Lee's quartet is essentially shown in an empathetic rather than condemnatory
light, and certain moments of vulnerability prove touching. Consider the following from Heinlein:
"During the past eighteen months there have been more times when I wanted to be dead than
there were times when I wanted to go on living." In having pieced together and analyzed
complementary and at times contradictory records, Nevala-Lee has also performed a historian's
duty and demythologized events written about elsewhere, often in comparatively unexamined
ways. Case in point, his account of Cleve Cartmill's story "Deadline" and Campbell's role in its
publication, the best coverage of this episode I've seen.
Though this is a long book, Nevala-Lee's writing style is smooth, and he tackles the profusion of
historical detail with a sprightly touch, so that it never feels overwhelming. It's actually hard not
to find something diverting on almost every random page. Here's a sprinkling of items that struck
- Campbell wrote his first story, "Invaders from the Infinite,, "as fast as he could because he
needed the money"--for a Model A Ford. T. O'Connor Sloane, then-editor of Amazing,
accepted it. Unfortunately, Sloane misplaced the manuscript, and since Campbell didn't
keep a carbon copy, the manuscript is irretrievably lost. (Campbell later re-used the title
for a different story).
- Campbell's second published story, "When the Atoms Failed," contains "one of the first
descriptions of a computer in science fiction."
- In his youth, Asimov loved long walks in the cemetery, the latest issue of Astounding in hand,
and he'd sometimes whistle, so that one day "the caretaker had to ask him not to disturb
visitors who might be there to mourn." This too is telling of his character: "Asimov's idea
of indulging himself after moving to Philadelphia had been to consume a huge bottle of
soda on his own, which only made him sick."
- Unbelievably by today's standards, "Blowups Happen" earned Heinlein a check from
Campbell that "allowed him [Heinlein] to pay off his mortgage."
- Henry Kuttner once "jokingly threatened to kill him [Ray Bradbury] if he didn't stop writing
so much purple prose."
I will say, the book's last one hundred or so pages are pretty agonizing stuff, not through
any fault of Nevala-Lee's, but due to the sheer grimness of how things turned out. To
paraphrase Isaac Bashevis Singer, "There's a long way between declining and death," and
this may be the ultimate sf-related measure of that distance. Psychological derailments,
health issues, mounting bitterness, embattlements and fallings out: the giants, especially
Campbell himself, truly had a long way to fall. It's difficult not to be saddened by the
parade of bad decisions and heinous ideas, by the self-delusions and isolationism, of such
brilliant and talented minds. As early as 1949, for instance, Campbell wrote a letter to
Heinlein claiming that he had a technique to "cure cancer." Things only get weirder. In the
end, perhaps Asimov--despite the travails caused by his HIV infection through a tainted
blood transfusion--emerges as the most truly content of the lot, but even in his case the
legacy of his son David adds a sad postscript to a remarkable story.
No matter. Despite the unfortunate-cum-tragic fates of some of these players, most
notably Campbell and Hubbard, this is an irresistible story, and a model study in how to
narratively interweave the lives of individuals with complex personalities and entangled
interrelationships. Theodore Sturgeon, whose own dealings with Campbell are described
in the book, once wrote a story about a gestalt consciousness arising through the
telepathic connection of disparate minds, and Nevala-Lee's Campbell-Asimov-Heinlein-Hubbard consciousness almost takes on a similar supra-individualistic quality, at least for a
while. The Sturgeon book in question is More than Human--which makes me wonder if
we might not be justified in thinking of Nevala-Lee's volume as More than Astounding.
Read more by Alvaro Zinos-Amaro